Some questions about the Zandvoort childporn case
Why Belgian Justice has been banned the activist Marcel Vervloesem who revealed the Zandvoort case, to talk with the media, 4 years ago ?
Why Justice has banned him to travel to other countries ?
Why Justice has banned him to contact us since his provisional liberation, 2 years ago? He is the founder of our association ‘Werkgroep Morkhoven’. We are members of the direction board of Werkgroep Morkhoven. We were working together during almost 40 years. We visited him during 2 years, every week in prison.
Why Justice has banned him to participate to all organisations fighting childabuse?
Was it the intention to criminalize him and our association ?
Was the Belgian Justice afraid that we should going on with our investigations about the childporn rings ?
Was it the intention to isolate him so that it would be easier to accuse him again in the tabloids ?
Justice used some new rumours in the Flemish tabloid Het Nieuwsblad and a very disputable complaint of a very disputable person to the police to take the script of Vervloesem’s book about his actions and his investigations. Why ?
Why they used the same trick (some rumours in Het Nieuwsblad, a complaint to the police, a prosecution by Justice) ? It is like 14 years ago when the international press (with even 3 Japanese newspapers) was interested in the Zandvoort childporn case.
Why they used the same trick also some years ago on the moment that a lot of people had many doubts about the accusations and the long media process ? And why they used again young people with criminal records (robberies, burglaries, exactions, thefts, vandalism, drug trafficking, involantary manslaughter by drunkenness, sexual offenses,) ?
Why the Belgian minister(s) of Justice and its so called independant magistrature, accepts that ? And why they accept that the Belgian constitution is violated ?
Where are the so called freedom of expression, freedom of press, the right on defense, the right to participate to associations, the right to travel, the principle that you are innocent until proven guilty, impartial and
independant juriprudence, the right to be judges on complete files without disappearances or thefts, which is (was) guaranteed by the Belgian constitution ?
Why the Flemish tabloid Het Nieuwsblad which started the mediacampaign against Marcel Vervloesem in 1998 with a false rumour of Vervloesem’s disputable half-brother Victor, silenced the Zandvoort childporn case during all that time ?
Why this tabloid, that seems to have a special relation with the Justice of Turnhout, was spreading also the false rumour that Marcel was no longer member of the direction board of our association while we can even not longer organize general meetings with all the members of the direction board and are thus unable to take important decisions ?
Why Justice does never investigate seriously the rumours, complaints, declarations of witnesses, incorrect accusations in Het Nieuwsblad and to the police ?
Why Justice says now that Marcel Vervloesem was ‘violating the conditions of his provisional liberation’ while his judicial assistent and his supervisor, the well-known professor Cosyns, were ‘very satisfied’ about that ?
Why does Justice not investigate the complaint of Vervloesem’s daughter about the threatening (taperecorded) of his 14 years old granddaughter by the accuser ?
Why we hear nothing about the 14-year-old girlfriend of the nearly 18-year-old accuser who was found drowned
in the pond of the court of Turnhout after she had inhaled too much gas of a lighter ?
Was the mediacampaign against Vervloesem and the silencing of the Zandvoort case which gives us a lot of information about the recent childabuse case in Amsterdam, a cover up operation ?
During our investigations, Georges Zicot, the disputable inspector in the Dutroux case, was giving false information about a well-known Youth Judge in France who we found back in the Zandvoort childporn case. What is the relation between the Zandvoort case and the Dutroux case ? Was the Dutroux case with the unexplained deaths of almost 30 witnesses, also a cover up operation ?
The Belgian government always denied the existance of an international childporn network like the Zandvoort case. Was it the intention to protect the international child porn network centralized in Brussels ?
It is possible that Belgium, center of Europe, is also a center of the international organized mafia, including child- and women trade ?
I heard today that Belgian Justice found a ‘new track’ to the so called gang of Brabant whereby 20 people were murdered. It is the 43th time during the last 20 years that Belgian Justice is talking about a ‘new track’ in this
case. Who can take this serious ? Why they are talking about it and are they giving false hope, every time that there a lot of questions about the credibility of Belgian Justice ?
It is clear that the Belgian church is playing a important role in cases of sexual abuse. But I am wondering that the tabloids were organizing during several months a media campaign about the scandals within the Belgian church while they organized during 14 years a media campaign to cover up the Zandvoort childporn case (90.000 victims, even babies).
President of Werkgroep Morkhoven
You can visit ‘Werkgroep Morkhoven’ on Facebook if the group will not be closed again by Facebook.
Write to Marcel Vervloesem who is seriously ill (cancer, heart, kidneys, diabetes) and was tortured during 2 years in prison: Gevangenis Turnhout, tav Marcel Vervloesem, Cel 139, Wezenstraat 1, 2300 Turnhout (Belgium)
Protest to the Belgian minister of Justice Annemie Turtelboom (liberals) email@example.com
Minister of Justice, Annemie Turtelboom, Boulevard de Waterloo 115, 1000 Bruxelles (Belgium)
Téléphone : (0031) 0 2 542 80 11 – Fax : 02 542 80 00 The minister says that she will ban ‘every form of partiality of the magistrature’.